The Effects of Using a Bulletin Board on Gender Differences in Program Coding
Article
Eshaa Alkhalifa, University of Bahrain, Bahrain
AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal) Volume 16, Number 2, ISSN 1065-6901 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
Gender studies across the world have produced a wealth of information generated by studies that seek to investigate the existence of a distinction between genders in mathematical-based courses, such as Computer Science courses. However, the Middle Eastern Region remained unexplored largely throughout this effort due to gender segregation during K-12 schooling and social restrictions. Therefore, the work presented here will study the effects of cross-gender, online collaboration on Middle Eastern women. A preliminary study is initially conducted on data collected from 1667 students who studied at the College of IT in order to set a benchmark for comparison between genders. Results indicated that female students lagged in Computer Science courses, leading to the introduction of an online bulletin board to allow interaction between all students in the Internet Technology course. Female students who participated in the board were compared to female students who did not participate, to male students who participated and to male students who did not participate. Results revealed a positive effect on the self-efficacy of female students who participated in the board as they electively chose to attempt a bonus task in greater numbers than their peers who did not participate in the task. These results inform us that these women lack the interaction required to be able to be competitive with their male peers. Additionally, it raises a question of whether classical instructional strategies are more aligned with male student requirements than with female student requirements, which place women at a disadvantaged position in class.
Citation
Alkhalifa, E. (2008). The Effects of Using a Bulletin Board on Gender Differences in Program Coding. AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal), 16(2), 95-114. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/24256/.
© 2008 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Al Balooshi, F., & Alkhalifa, E.M. (2002). Multi-modality as a cognitive tool. [Special issue]. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 5(4), 49-55.
- Austin-Smith, B. (1995). Internet and gender. Canadian Dimension, 29(1), 22-23.
- Bandura, A., & Shunk, D.H. (1981).Cultivating competence, self-efficacy and intrinsic interest through self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
- Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V.S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
- Barling, J., & Beattie, R. (1983). Self-efficacy beliefs and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 5, 41-51.
- Behar-Molad, C. (2000). Women weaving webs: Will women rule the internet? Houston, TX: CMB Press.
- Bouffard-Bouchard, T. (1990). Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 353-363.
- Brayton, J. (1999). Women's love/hate relationship with the internet. In I. Markovic (Ed.), Cyberfeminism (pp. 193-202). Zagreb, Croatia: Centre
- Bruckman, A. (2004). Co-evolution of technological design and pedagogy in an online learning community. In S. Barab, R. Gray, & J. Gray
- Clark, J. (2001). Stimulating collaboration and discussion in online learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 4(2), 119-124.
- Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
- Durndell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the internet and reported experience with the internet, by gender, in an Eastern European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 521-535.
- Ferris, S.P. (1996). Women on-line. Cultural and relational aspects of women’s communication in on-line discussion groups. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 4(3-4), 29-40.
- Forman, E.A., & Cazden, C.B. (1986). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J.V.
- Gerrard, L. (1999). Feminist research in computers and composition. In K. Blair & P. Takayoshi (Eds.), Feminist cyberscapes: Essays on gender in electronic spaces. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
- Hacket, G., & Betz, N.E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics selfefficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261-273.
- Herring, S. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication [Special issue]. Electronic Journal of Communication, 3(2).
- Huff, C. (2002). Gender, software design, and occupational equity. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 112-115.
- Johnson, D.W., & Johnson R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
- King, L.J. (2000). Gender issues in online communities. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, 18(1).
- Margolis, J., Fisher, A., & Miller, F. (1999). Caring about connections: Gender and computing. Educational Technology and Society, 18(4).
- Margolis, J., Fisher, A., & Miller, F. (2001). Living among the "programming gods": The nexus of confidence and interest. In J. Margolis (Ed.), Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing (pp.77-92). Cambridge,
- Morahan-Martin, J. (2000). Women and the internet: Promise and perils. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(5), 683-691.
- Ora, J.P. (1965). Characteristics of the volunteer for psychological investigations. Office of Naval Research Contract, 2149(03), Technical Report 27. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center. Pajares, F., (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self regulated learning. Theory and Practice, 41(2), 116-125.
- Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 95-110.
- Sherman, R.C., End, C., Kraan, E., Cole, A, Campbell, J., Birchmeir, Z., et al. (2000). The internet gender gap among college students: Forgotten but not gone? CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(5), 885-894.
- Spender, D. (2000). The digital life style for women. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, 18(1).
- Suller, J.R. (2004). Do boys (and girls) just wanna have fun? In A. Kunkel (Ed.), Gender communication (pp. 149-153). Dubuque, IO: Kendall/
- Traver, H.A., Kalsher, M.J., Diwan, J.J., & Warden, J. (2001). Student reactions and learning: Evaluation of a biochemistry coarse that uses web technology and student collaboration. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 29, 50-53.
- Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. New York: Simon & Schuster.
- Vygotsky, L.S. (1962).Thought and language (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Eds./Trans.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Wheeler, D.L. (2004). The internet in the Arab world: Digital divides and cultural connections. Royal Institute of Inter-Faith Studies. Retrieved February 10, 2007, from http://www.riifs.org/guest/lecture_text/internet_n_arabworld_all_txt.htm
- Zeldin, A., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 215-246.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References